The superior moral virtue of pressure politics
If I have to listen to one more NPR report touting the virtue of left-wing pressure politics, I think I'm going to vomit.
"Oh, look at how awful the world would be without me forcing the world to be good," I have to listen to a million liberal journalists on NPR tout every day.
"If it weren't for my superior virtue," I have to listen to liberals sounding like Pat Robertson or Jerry Falwell, "the world would never be such a good place."
Makes me want to vomit. Not least of which because it's bullshit.
I swear to God that every liberal journalist in the country, right now, thinks that they uniquely are responsible for every good thing this earth has to offer, so self-centered are they in their "superior virtue." There is no virtue outside of liberal pressure politics reason these radicals in sheep's clothing. "If it weren't for us," these liberals reason, "the world would be a cesspool of non-liberal virtue."
Makes me want to spit my guts up.
I appreciate liberals pressuring me to be politically correct as much as I appreciate conservatives pressuring me to morally upright.
What's disgusting about both camps is the self-righteousness of it all. There is noone virtuous outside of our camp, our group, our ideology, our activism. There is noone virtuous outside of us.
Noone has a right to my mind or my labor or my conscience. Fuck you. And on the stuff that matters, I will kick the living shit out of your piss-poor fuckin' expectations, liberals and conservatives.
Pox on both their houses, I say.
Being liberal used mean something to me. Now what it means is being a bully for pick your left-wing cause. And I want nothing to do with that ugliness.
Real progress doesn't come out of bullying.
Real progress comes from changing hearts and minds, as a real liberal, Martin Luther King, argued 40 years ago.
A million liberals think that they have somehow outthunk Dr. King. He was assassinated because he was such a pussy, these arrogant, self-righteous radicals reason. Dr. King just wasn't willing to kick enough ass, these nasty, narrow-minded little activists argue. He just didn't understand the power of Malcolm X's hate and spite and racism.
Love and thought and debate and engagement are all good and all of that, they reason. But really what we need is someone like Hugo Chavez or Noam Chomsky or Charlie Rangel to really kick some serious conservative ass.
The whole thing makes me want to vomit.
And definitely convinces me that I don't want to be a part of that gang anymore then I want to be a Blood or a Crip.
This is why liberals gain so little traction in the culture. Because so many liberals really don't respect that people disagree with them. Disagree with us all you want, reason so many liberals these days. But you're gonna do what the fuck we say.
And I say, "Fuck you, you fuckin' bullies."
And fuck everyone who reasons this way with no respect for my freedom and my conscience.
Love,
Ben