I just got back from the Illinois State speech camp...had a great time, for the most part...it's a great team...competitive...smart...ballsy...nice and supportive as all hell...just a great group of folks...
I was something of an anomaly, I guess, since I was one of the very rare non-Big-L-liberals at the gathering...I'm a small-l liberal...meaning I believe that democracy and freedom are the foundations for everything that we value in modern societies...small-l liberalism is big tent liberalism that has plenty of room for conservatives and liberals, alike...my whole life has been liberal -- both Big-L and small-l -- in all functional respects...my family, and my father and I at the forefront, were peace activists and poverty activists...
I got into special education and education as a part of my commitments to poverty efforts and inner city school reform...I'm a vegitarian and eat organic, as much as possible, for health reasons, primarily, but also for non-self-righteous moral reasons...I've been gay-friendly and environmentally aware and committed for an awful long time...much of my study in grad school was of Martin Luther King and the Civil Rights Movement in the U.S. and Ghandi's Independence Movement in India...I have this really soft spot in my heart for outsiders, the downtrodden, and others that it is all too easy to exclude or hate or hurt or repress...I generally have a much stronger commitment to keeping people together on a team or in a group or in a family or a world than most people do...I genuinely care about people from all backgrounds, even people who it is very easy to not care about or to hate...
In all personal and social ways, people would probably recognize me as a liberal...
Except one really important caveat...I don't think that liberals have all the right answers...and on many very important questions, I think conservatives, particularly more libertarian conservatives -- the Economist may just be the smartest periodical in the world as far as I am concerned -- have better answers...and I'm not shy about saying so...Which is kind of awkward, sometimes, when you are in social gatherings where liberals dominate, I have to say...
Now, I would far prefer to deal with that kind of awkwardness with so many friends than somehow align myself with the nasty, vengeful, punitive, controlling sort of conservativism that characterizes, say, the Chicago Sun that I read for a bit while we were visiting Chicago...and I'm definitely not socially conservative, though I do very much understand the concerns of social conservatives...I just think a moral society is best achieved with more freedom and thought than with more control and punishment and conversion...and like Mark Twain, I just think the whole world would be a lot better off if it just wasn't so obsessed with morality and controlling one another in all kinds of unhealthy ways, even as I think moral concerns are important and valuable concerns in a free society...
But I seriously digress...It was a great time, in most respects...but also an awkward one, at times, because I'm just not a radical...and I felt like my liberal friends were being somewhat unfair to conservative ideas and thought while we talked politics...I also though folks could be a little obsessed with forensics success, at times...I was surrounded by national champions:):)...but that's for another day:):)...
Anyway...we talked about Israel and Lebanon, health care and education, Martin Luther King and Malcolm X, and a whole lot of forensics...
And I guess the biggest thing I took back with me is that I'm just kind of tired of all the fighting, I guess...
Brian and Bond, my fellow extemp leaders, were right and I was dead wrong, as it turned out, in our conversation about Martin Luther King...they were saying that King got more radical as the civil rights movement progressed...I was convinced that King's later years were the ones where he got more focussed on love and compassion and changing hearts and minds...And I was wrong, as it turned out...King did get more radical over the years, it seems...he advocated a poverty Bill of Rights and for racial reparations, and social democratic programs and politics...none of which I would advocate, today -- and just think those same concerns are better cared for in the civil society than by the government -- but none of which are serious concerns for me...
The big concern for me was King's support for the various left-wing revolutions of the 60's...that advocacy -- of revolutions that killed so many and destroyed so much over the the course of the 20th Century which so many liberal and Marxists, like conservatives who rationalize the means of Nazis and Fascists, never seem to be able to face up to and take responsibilty for and which is the basis of support for so many terrorist groups, today -- is the one most seriously dissappointing quality in King's legacy, as far as I'm concerned...his cheating was human and not something that seriously concerned me in the same way that this kind of ill-considered advocacy of revolutionary activity that has so undermined so much progress in so many areas of the world and killed and maimed many people and their futures in the process...And as someone who spent so much time studying Martin Luther King in grad school -- civil rights and poverty issues are at the heart of the reason why I wanted to teach in inner city schools -- I was just kind of embarrassed to find out that I didn't know about King's advocacy for left-wing revolutions (King argued, foolishly, that America was on the wrong side of such revolutions)...
Apparently King not only seriously underestimated his own and Mahatma Ghandi's non-violent legacies, he was unaware that it was left-wing revolutionaries that would go on to kidnap the 11 Israeli athletes killed at the 1972 Munich Olympics...and left-wing revolutionaries who would slaughter millions of Vietnamese after the U.S. abandoned its military engagements there...and left-wing revolutionaries who sponsor terrorist groups including the Irish Republican Army, the armed ETA Basque separatists in Spain, the FMLN in El Salvador, the Sandanistas in Nicaragua, and several other bloody left wing terrorist and revolutionary groups in the latter half of the 20th Century...not to mention the Bolshevik, Maoist, and Communist revolutions in Cuba and North Korea...and certainly not to mention the domestic left wing terrorism in the United States...the Weathermen, the Symbionese Liberation Army, the Black Panthers (though, to King's credit, he was also very critical of violent and radical civil rights organizations like the Panthers and the later ironically-titled Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee)...
Plenty of right wing radical activity that was bloody and ugly in the 20th century...Nazis in Germany, Fascists in Italy and Spain, radical Islam in Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Lebanon, Syria, Egypt, Palestine and much of the Middle East...Al Queda and the Muslim Brotherhood...dictators like Augusto Pinochet of Chile and Major General Park Chung Hee of South Korea, the KKK and militia groups including the bombing of the Oklahoma City Federal Building by Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols in the late 90's...
The lists of terrorist and violent groups who have killed and maimed and threatened and bullied in the name of ideology is really far too long for me to list them all...And the point really is that everyone thinks they're right...and everyone seems to be willing to go to some pretty gruesome extremes to prove just how right they are...And this weekend, I just got really tired of listening to people rationalize and excuse all that bullshit...like somehow it was/is really more noble than it really was/is...
I'm tired of fighting about it...but I'm more tired of people acting like its no big deal...like murdering people in the name of a cause is really ok...like the only thing that matters is winning, no matter who gets hurt...
I have to say that the reason why I don't identify as a Big-L liberal anymore...is because I am just so goddamned tired of listening to this bullshit like it should taken more seriously than it really should...It is kind of interesting to me how the debaters I meet -- the far more aggressive competition between speech and debate I think most of my debate friends would agree -- have tended to be far more moderate than many of my forensics friends...crazy, huh?...I had this really long, great talk with this CEDA debate champ from University of Northern Iowa about truth and reconcilation, which happens to be central to a lot of my political thinking and was the case that she ran in the final round the year she won the national championship...she was thinking of working on John McCain's campaign because she, like I, was terrified of Hillary Clinton as President and because she thought McCain would swing the country left (the latter reason I doubt, but I imagine that she, like I, is beginning to see beyond the blinders of ideology)...
I also met some really smart, bitchy, ambitious liberal women this weekend, that totally reinforced my feeling that I am much more interested in someone nice and decent and smart for a wife/life partner much more than someone smart and ambitious, alone...the latter can also mean heartless, I'm learning -- my concern about Hillary Clinton, really -- and I just want no part of that for my daily life...I met a girl this week who reminded me very much of my first really serious girlfriend, Jenny Burrington, who was and is a doll, really, and it totally reinforced for me that I would, in a heartbeat, rather date someone nice and decent than brilliant and bitchy, any day of the week...though I must say that Illinois State is largely a team of really wonderful girls and guys...
I guess I'm just weary of the fighting...and mostly, of all the rationalizations of all the people we kill in the name of the "right" ideology...which doesn't exist...never has existed...never will exist...I feel very much like Thomas Hobbes in 17th Century Great Britain trying to make sense of all of the religioius warfare of his time, watching the foolish divisions among Catholics and Protestants rationalize warfare that would take so much life for so little reason...and beginning to understand the first and foremost responsibility of government is to protect people from that kind of violence...though much more squarely with John Locke, Jacques Rousseau and John Stuart Mill that such protection must be democratic and protect freedom as fundamental...
As I watch the Bush Administration and the Olmert government in Israel rationalize an ugly incursion in Lebanon and longer term warfare that has clearly not ended hostilities in the Middle East and never will...ever...absent a realistic peace process...
I am sad as I watch so many of my friends line up on sides...rooting on the killing and the death...in the name of ideology...I just want it all to end...And the excuses for it that make it all possible, most of all...The world has just taken this really ugly path the last 6 years or so...conservatives...liberals...even many moderates...it's been a period of coercion and force rationalized as if they really can solve problems if we would just give force a chance (John Lennon must be rolling in his grave)...
That 14-year-old kid in Talahassee died on the altar of all of our hubris...
And I just want it all to end...
Do people really believe that the Soviet Union could have made the independence efforts in Lithuania and Latvia and Estonia go away by rolling in tanks?...do people really believe that China and Cuba and North Korea and Vietnam really will be the last remaining bullwark of a socialist utopia? Do people really believe that democracy, at its heart, is really no different from Nazism or Fascism or Communism or theocracy, even as all of these ideologies can be accomodated in a democracy? Do people really believe that murder and political blackmail and violence are really no different from democratic engagement and discourse to resolve important problems that humanity faces?...Do people really believe that we can make terrorism in Palestine, Lebanon, and Afghanistan, Communism in North Korea, China, and Cuba, the nuclear ambitions of a theocratic democracy like Iran, or any of the other most important problems of the world go away with military force?...Are we that completely blind to the power of ideology and politics and the universal aspirations of freedom and equity?
I'm just tired of all the pointless, destructive fighting...I'm tired of so many people being killed for absolutely no good goddamn reason at all...and certainly no reason that has ever ended any of the hostilities...
That's why Louis Armstrong's 1970 version of What a Wonderful World was always Brandi's and my song...
As Louis says,
"Some of you young folks have been sayin' to me, 'Hey pops, what you mean what a wonderful world? How about all them wars all over the place? You call them wonderful? And how about hunger and pollution? They ain't so wonderful either.' Well how about listening to old pops for a minute? Seems to me, it ain't the world that's so bad, but what we're doing to it. And all I'm sayin' is see what a wonderful world it would be if only we'd give it a chance. Love, baby, love. That's the secret. Yeah. If lot's more of us loved each other, we'd solve lots more problems. And man, this world would be Odessa."
I just want all this stupidity to end, is the truth...
I'm realistic...but I also know that its the only way through this mess...it's like a peace process in the Middle East...I'm realistic that the Administration, the Israeli Government, and Hezbollah and Hamas are not going to take up a formal peace process, right now, for whatever stupid, foolish, destructive reasons...but I'm also realistic about the long term enough to know that there is no way out of that mess without a mutual commitment to a peace process...no side will ever admit defeat...they will go on fighting until they finally exhaust their foolish rationalizations and save some face through a peace process that they, like Gerry Adams in Northern Ireland, develop something of a genuine commitment to that peace...
But what I'm most frustrated with...is the 6 billion or so people throughout the world who just can't seem to find it in themselves to think for themselves and to stop encouraging this ugly nonsense and find the courage to speak in favor of a world where they can be independent thinkers and not have to root on this ugliness as if one side or the other is ever going to win in any meaningful way...
Our children and grandchildren, I'm convinced, will look back on all of this foolishness and shake their heads as we do, today, at Catholics and Protestants fighting for dominance in 17th and 18th century European governance and imperial ambitions...
So much destruction...so little reason...
And I just want it all to end...
And it'd be nice to surrounded by more folks who also want it to end and aren't interested in rooting on the various groups around the world who murder in the name of ideology and being right...
The Economist did this really great piece in their recent Kim Jong Il Rocketman edition celebrating the political accomplishment of the Socialist Prime Minister of Spain Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero in brokering a deal with the ETA, the militant wing of Basque separatism in Spain which is responsible for the deaths of approximately 800 people, and criticizing Spain's conservative leaders for opposing the deal...the conservative editors of the Economist surely recognize the proven success of the Belfast Agreement in their home country of Great Britain in ending terrorist violence in Northern Ireland with the approval of the Clinton and Blair governments and the significance of conservatives in Britain supporting that agreement...
And that's what democratic engagement should look like...looking a reality square in the face and doing the right thing and being willing to criticize even those you identify with if it means moving the world ahead several paces...The consistent theme in so many Economist articles, these days, is "bad to worse"...that's how so much of the world has moved in the recent weeks...bad to worse...and there's nothing that good faith observers can do but watch it, note it, and hope for an end to all of the senseless tragedy...
I just want it all to end...and I especially want for average people to stop rationalizing it like it's somehow all better than it really is...
Martin Luther King was mistaken when he excused left wing revolutions for the sake of social democratic ends...supporting democratic revolutions is one thing and certainly justifiable when there is no way to peacefully usher in a democracy, as was the case with the American revolution...a democratic revolution, not an ideological revolution, largely...but justifying perpetual violence and revolution for the sake of an ideology, any ideology, except to usher in a democratic government where people can peacefully and freely decide these questions together is wrong...and so are everyone who rationalize it today...it has caused and causes today so much death, destruction, violence, and power gambles that are arrogant and fail to face their own terrible legacy...
King's far stronger legacy was his legacy of non-violence and his commitment to peace and democracy and love and compassion and forgiveness and the more authentic justice that comes out of those impulses and values...it is that legacy that is the basis for the truth and reconciliation processes in South Africa, East Timor, Chile, and around the world...and the only hope for escaping the cycle that Desmond Tutu and Pablo Friere and Martin Luther King and Mohatma Ghandi and Henry David Thoreau and The Buddha and Jesus of Nazareth have so eloquently cautioned us against of groups exacting revenge one another into perpetuity...and the practical justification for a world of love and compassion and decency...
And I just want all the violence and bloodshed in the name of ideology and certainly in King's name to end...
We will never resolve our various political concerns until this fundamental respect for one another is taken more seriously...and as often as humanity seems wont to prove that it is unworthy of such faith, it not only stumbles forward in this direction, consistently...this direction is the only direction that it can stumble forward into lest be stuck in cycles of violence and power and destruction and control and inequality that humanity is forever trying to escape...
And as the Economist recognizes...this is just a really bad time for humanity, right now..."bad to worse"...has been for a while, truth be told...
Darkest before the dawn, I can only hope?
All I know is that it has to end...Including the moral support that we all provide to this ugliness...
"Seems to me, it ain't the world that's so bad, but what we're doing to it. And all I'm sayin' is see what a wonderful world it would be if only we'd give it a chance. Love, baby, love. That's the secret. Yeah. If lot's more of us loved each other, we'd solve lots more problems. And man, this world would be Odessa."
That's the secret...he's right about that...whether we find the courage to dig deep and move in that direction or not, at this moment...
Love,
Ben