Sunday, May 31, 2009

My serenity prayer

This is my hometown, so it hits close to home. Particularly tragic, for me, since my life is dedicated to ending this nonsense.

Suspect in slaying of abortion provider George Tiller being returned to Wichita

What is wrong with people that they have such a hard time admitting that, maybe, especially on the big things, perhaps, they just might be wrong?

This is the problem with contemporary liberal democratic politics. And this is one of the more extreme consequences of that more fundamental failure of our humanity.

The violence of people like Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Queda, the Castro regime, Kim Jong Il, and the totalitarian Communist government in China all reflect the very same and ugly impulse.

What is wrong with us that we refuse to give it up?

We are fools is what is wrong.

May we find the serenity to accept the things we cannot change, the courage to change the things we can, and the wisdom to know the difference.

Thursday, May 21, 2009

Repression is bad for your health

And liberal democracy is a pretty decent predictor of health. A quick look at the most recent life expectancy figures might confirm this conclusion.

WHO: Japan, San Marino top life-expectancy list

No mistake why countries like Zimbabwe and Sierre Leone, two of the more violent and repressive countries in the world, are at the bottom of these figures and countries like Japan and San Marino, the latter being the oldest constitutional republic in the world, top the list.

Liberal democrats (meaning those who support freedom and democratic values and government) need to take time to remember that we have much more in common in our values, which make for better lives, than we have different.

This is as good as a time as any.

Tuesday, May 19, 2009

Progress

Gloria is right. This is what we need. More dialogue, less culture war.

Obama ignores the 'rules,' stirs the pot

This is the direction that the country needs.

One day, this needs to be the norm.

Monday, May 18, 2009

Foolish circling, wise peace

The circling that Israel and Palestine are doing, right now, is so remarkably foolish and futile, it is amazing that we all watch it and take it more seriously than it deserves.

Hamas wants acceptance without changing ideology

Does Hamas really believe that witholding recognition of Israel's right to exist will make their neighbor to the east go away? It would be irrational in the extreme to believe so.

Does Israel really believe withholding support for a Palestinian state offers any viable path to a more permanent peace with their neighbors to the west? Obviously not, to any empirically-grounded observer.

So what is all of this about?

It is about the dubious and deeply flawed notion that if peace efforts by moderates are supported unflinchingly by the hardline efforts of those willing to use military force then a resolution will be crafted favorable to the party who can force terms in their direction. Both parties, presumably. Kind of funny and stupid, when you think about it.

The bottom line between Israel and Palestine is now as it always has been. You need two partners more genuinely committed to peace and ending murder, death, and chaos in the lives of innocent Israeli and Palestinian citizens than the power games designed to acquire more land or concessions so that the collective egos of the various parties are not wounded with the unchangeable fact that neither party will get everything they want in a final peace agreement and that all of the pain and heartache of the last 100 years will only be resolved through a commitment to peace and reconciliation.

You need two parties negotiating peace in good faith. You need some kind of security agreement that will arrest or kill any combatants still threatening the lives of innocent Israelis and Palestinians. And everything else is gravy.

To anyone who really cares about ending the bloodshed and not playing power politics, that is.

Which begs the question:

Is there anyone in Israel or Palestine more committed to ending the deaths of innocent civilians than to the power politics?

We shall see.

Love

You know what holds humanity up most?

That we are all just too foolish and cowardly to live up to our values. Or to face honestly that we do not.

How is it possible for a people so premised around Christian values spend 10 years rationalizing why they should not have to live up to Christianity's central premise: forgiveness, love, and compassion for our neighbors?

When you take a step back from it, it is both funny and sad all at once.

And the truth is that there is and never will be any real progress until we get over it.

I see slow, faint glimmers of hope. We're getting there. Just excruciatingly slow.

However long it takes, I suppose.

That's why forgiveness and compassion are so important.

Because we are the ones who, in the end, will need it most.

Luckily, love always finds a way. Always.

Sunday, May 17, 2009

Real progress

Nick Gillespie points in its honest direction.

Paying With Our Sins

Repression is not progress. They move in opposite directions.

Time to have the courage to get honest.

And move in the direction that honest progress suggests.

Friday, May 15, 2009

Love and cynicism

I think I understand the cynicism about love, now.

You can't make anyone else love for them.

And the disappointment about that fact can be too much for some people to bear they may feel, sometimes. Although, really, strong hearts can bear whatever they need to bear.

It is just a fact of life.

That doesn't mean that love is not the most appropriate lens through which to look at the world.

It just means that you can't make the world or anyone in it reciprocate.

And, yet, a world and a life without love would really just be too tragic to bear. For any of us.

Which is why love triumphs over cynicism. Every time.

And always will.

Thursday, May 14, 2009

Liberal compassion and wisdom

This is why he's the Dean.

David Broder: Stop the Scapegoating

"If ever there is a time for President Obama to trust his instincts and stick to his guns, that time is now, when he is being pressured to change his mind about closing the books on the "torture" policies of the past.

Obama, to his credit, has ended one of the darkest chapters of American history, when certain terrorist suspects were whisked off to secret prisons and subjected to waterboarding and other forms of painful coercion in hopes of extracting information about threats to the United States.

He was right to do this. But he was just as right to declare that there should be no prosecution of those who carried out what had been the policy of the United States government. And he was right, when he sent out his chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, to declare that the same amnesty should apply to the lawyers and bureaucrats who devised and justified the Bush administration practices.

But now Obama is being lobbied by politicians and voters who want something more -- the humiliation and/or punishment of those responsible for the policies of the past. They are looking for individual scalps -- or, at least, careers and reputations.

Their argument is that without identifying and punishing the perpetrators, there can be no accountability -- and therefore no deterrent lesson for future administrations. It is a plausible-sounding rationale, but it cloaks an unworthy desire for vengeance...

...The torture memos represented a deliberate, and internally well-debated, policy decision, made in the proper places -- the White House, the intelligence agencies and the Justice Department -- by the proper officials.

One administration later, a different group of individuals occupying the same offices have -- thankfully -- made the opposite decision. Do they now go back and investigate or indict their predecessors?

That way, inevitably, lies endless political warfare. It would set the precedent for turning all future policy disagreements into political or criminal vendettas. That way lies untold bitterness -- and injustice.

Suppose that Obama backs down and Holder or someone else starts hauling Bush administration lawyers and operatives into hearings and courtrooms.

Suppose the investigators decide the country does not want to see the former president and vice president in the dock. Then underlings pay the price while big shots go free. But at some point, if he is at all a man of honor, George W. Bush would feel bound to say: That was my policy. I was the president. If you want to indict anyone for it, indict me.

Is that where we want to go? I don't think so. Obama can prevent it by sticking to his guns."

The truth is that compassion, empathy, and the wisdom that springs from it, is the best that liberalism has to offer.

This was why I was a liberal as a kid. And it is where the best instincts of both liberals and conservatives are found.

It is no mistake that Jesus of Nazareth, the spiritual inspiration for most liberals and conservatives in America and in the world, had a life and a philosophy centered in love and compassion. And it is no mistake that this life and philosophy and the similarly decent and compassionate belief systems of so many moral, religious, and philosophical traditions serve as the moral compasses of most people around the world.

It is no mistake that most children in America learn to "do unto others as you would them do unto you."

The most important rule in this situation as should be the case in most cases in America and almost all matters in the world is the Golden Rule.

But every so often, our baser, more vengeful, more meanspirited, uglier impulses creep up and get confused with these nobler ideals.

It is about time that we stop this nonsense and stop pretending that the ugliness is really more decent or honest or better than it is.

We have gone on long enough like this.

Now is a good time to end this and to move forward.

Because, frankly, if we do not, this is not an America, anymore, that I would want to be a part of if we were choose anything different.

Because I, for one, cannot choose the ugliness and call it decent when it very clearly is not.

And I'm tired of the pretenders being taken more seriously than they deserve this political period.

It is time for us to make a turn for much more genuine progress.

And this direction, of more genuine liberal compassion and wisdom, marks the way.

If only we will have the wisdom to follow it.

The fear to admit that we might be wrong

For whatever reason, this fear - the fear to admit that we might be wrong - is one of the most pernicious and tragic of fears. It is responsible for so much damage in the world.

And all for what?

The more I understand it, the less I understand it.

So much needless tragedy. So sad and foolish.

My life is committed to seeing this foolish tendency, and the tragedy that comes with it, end, as much as possible.

It won't completely. But that is no reason to not expect better of ourselves. And create less of our own tragedy along the way.

Wednesday, May 13, 2009

Liberal values, power, and this question of torture

Debate Over 'Torture' Lacks Seriousness

The debate over torture by this last Administration is actually much more involved than Mr. Sowell lets on, here.

But this is still one of the stronger pieces on torture that I have read to date.

Debate and engagement, not strong-arming, is how we will get to truth more often. And that debate needs to get honest. Including about what our own instincts would be given the scenarios that interrogators and the Administration faced.

What we need much more of, in liberal democracies, is much more honesty about our real instincts and how we honestly account for them and not the kind of moral grandstanding that the left and the right have been engaged in, these last 10 years.

If you doubt that repression breaks down, over time, keep watching this debate.

The more I watch, the more confidence I have that liberal values trump power, long term, any day of the week.

Scared and foolish

The heart of what is wrong with humanity, much of the time. And the reason for most of our most serious and foolish mistakes and tragedies.

If there is anything that I've learned from our unit on Hitler, this month, and its parallels to our current challenges, this is it.

And if there is anything I have learned in the last 10 years it is that intelligence is no guarantee of avoiding either. Which is why I trust heart more than smarts.

So scared. So foolish. And too little courage and too much intimidation to acknowledge either.

How tragic that we would learn our lessons so slowly and create so much tragedy until we do.

Monday, May 11, 2009

1-2-3-4, the Empathy Challenge



Attention, empathy-challenged. Just try to hate this video. I dare you.

Because, really, if you do, fuck you, too. And who really cares what you think anyway.

Obama's plan and liberal accounting

Let us not say that we haven't been warned.

Quick fix today, crisis tomorrow in Obama's White House

Friday, May 08, 2009

"Precious little snowflakes"

Bill Maher reminds Americans that maybe they are not the snowflakes they imagine themselves to be.

Americans, please wash hands before criticizing Obama

"New Rule: Now that we've answered his call to wash our hands, President Obama must continue to tell us how to live. Last week, when America was faced with the pan-global swine flu omega death plague, the President went on TV and told people to wash their hands, and experts tell us this made a big difference, which augurs well for next month's 'National Wipe Your Butt Day.' Next week, in a fireside chat, he'll tell us not to put a fork in the toaster.

It's sad that the leader of the free world had to call a live press conference to tell his nation of clueless nitwits that employees must wash hands before returning to work. If that's not the 'Forrest Gump-ification' of America, I don't know what is. Feeling wet, America? Why not try new, 'Coming in from the Rain'?

You may think I'm blowing this out of proportion, but this plea from Obama - you know, the "Audacity of Soap' - was the first specific thing a President has asked the American people to actually do in decades. Unless you count 'go shopping.' Hopefully it will open the door to other, slightly weightier suggestions from the President.

So please, Mr. President, tell us to turn the lights off when we leave the room. Tell us not to buy crap we don't need and can't afford. Tell us to lay off the Ring Dings and Cheese Nips, and think twice before dating a stranger we meet on craigslist. For God's sake, tell people to read a newspaper. Not just to save the newspaper industry - though Lord knows I'd miss my Daily Jumble - but because having a public that actually knows something is our best defense against ever again electing a President who knows nothing...

...During the campaign, Obama suggested that one simple thing Americans could do to help with fuel-efficiency was check their car's tire pressure. And Republicans freaked, because to them, every suggestion for the common good is a direct attack on their personal liberty, and it's unpatriotic to interfere with anyone's God-given right to be big, dumb and selfish.

When the President suggests things that will help the greater good, that's not a slight against your fragile manhood. I know, you're a rugged individualist. But you're not - you're just a schmuck.

Going back to Reagan, all of our leaders have predictably and reliably told us that government is always the problem, never you my precious, perfect American citizen. You are always perfect just the way you are, like a precious little snowflake. A beautiful, precious, 350-pound, pig-ignorant snowflake."

Maybe it's time for all of us to stop pretending. That's why I trust the likes of Bill Maher, Larry the Cable Guy, and Mark Twain more than so many in political office.

Because they pretends less. And that is the example, and not the examples in Congress, we all need to be following, these days.

Wednesday, May 06, 2009

Partisans really just do not get it

A very nice reflection on the torture question by David Harsanyi.

Sorry, History is Just Not That Simple

I really don't know what to tell liberals and conservatives, anymore. This period is not going to be remembered as a vindication of any ideology. Like every period, it will be a debate about ideas. And no ideology, like no religion, will ever be a victor in that conflict.

What that debate will yield, hopefully, is a more honest and compassionate wisdom that serves us and future generations.

And that is the best that anyone can or should hope for.

When they are being honest with themselves, that is.

Tuesday, May 05, 2009

The Wisdom of Solomon

Have these people never read the Book of Kings? Solomon had other things to say on this matter. As would Jesus.

Beware of Empathy

Sometimes Republicans really are the stupid party. What a foolish and unwinnable battle they have chosen.

How ironic that they would take on empathy in the courtroom at the very moment when their last Administration will be in so desperate need of it. How and ironic and terribly, terribly foolish.

I'm pretty sure this is not something that Jesus would do.

"Liberal democracy"

Britain can call itself many things with this ban. Liberal and democratic are not among those.

Britain's 'least wanted' blacklist

I wonder why Zimbabwe's repressive leadership looks to its former colonial master and says, "Who are you to judge?"

Perhaps we have given up on liberal democratic values altogether.

If so, we should at least be honest that that we have abandoned them for something more "progressive."

Monday, May 04, 2009

The legacy of Jack Kemp

As the GOP looks for guidance for what kind of party they should become, the man who passed on Saturday offers one of its brighter lights.

Jack Kemp: Capitalist for the Common Man

A humble commitment to democracy, free markets, and a passion for doing good is a far stronger foundation for a party than fear or exclusion.

Jack Kemp, you will be missed. Thank you for your contributions while you were here.