Outlining the book...
Tim McGraw's Live Like You Were Dying, this morning, has me thinking that I better get on this book while I'm still guaranteed life to do it...
And talking with Carson completely inspired me to get to work on it because Carson talks like how I like to talk...about everything...and with everything connected, at some level, with everything else...or at least with potential...I hate stuffy intellectual conversations where I've topics off-limits to discuss important and not-so-important stuff...and Carson's brain works the same way...but also in ways that help me see my blindspots, better...and which highlight differences that offer me strengths that he has to appreciate and emulate...
The book I'm writing is going to be in two parts, at this point...
The first part is the namesake for the book, The Limits of Power...it's an empirical collection of case studies to make arguments about the limits of power, both in particular cases and generally...when the use of force is effective...when it is ineffective...and, as often as not, when it has limited, immediate effectiveness and long-term counterproductivity...
That last point is probably the most important, because it is the place where people miss the problems with the use of force, the most...they calculate for the short term...and end up with unintended and counterproductive long term consequences that, of course, noone wants to take responsibility for...blowback -- the CIA term for such unintended political consequences -- is one example of this problem in international policy circles...
But the truth is that it happens everywhere...in domestic and international policy...as well as in organizations and interpersonal situations...its more common than not, really...and those with smaller worldviews do it more often than those without...because they just don't know what's good for them in the big picture, is the truth...and it is the failure to account for this problem by people far too enamoured with the use of force and far too little thoughtful about its use that gets everyone in trouble...and for which noone seems to want to take responsibility (though they are quick to take credit for any short term advantages it might yield)...
So the first part of the book is a empirical review of evidence from case studies...my point will not at all be to prove my case...I'm genuinely exploring case studies...and those that contradict me, I will cite and buttress contrary cases so I'm taking on the strongest counter-arguments, rather than strawmen...if I'm wrong, I want to know it...and I want to make whatever case seems strongest to me, no matter what...
It doesn't make any sense, really, to want to buttress your own case for anything without considering how and why you might be wrong...because if you're wrong, you're wrong...truth is just thinking about reality, which doesn't give a shit whether you don't understand it or not...it just is...and my job is to deduce it better, given what I know and what more I can learn over the course of this book...
Drug laws...gun laws...economic and environmental regulation...regulations on speech...death penalty...military force...diplomacy...education policy...criminal sentencing...violent crime...anything and everything that I have even the slightest -- and by the end of the book, the deepest -- understanding and familiarity with, I will tackle...I want my best cases and I want my hardest cases...I want those cases that pose the strongest counterarguments to my general theses, up to this point, and I want to make those arguments as powerful and credible as possible...
I don't give two shits about being right if I'm wrong...doing so makes no goddamn sense if you really care about getting to better answers rather than getting to answers to reinforce your own biases and assumptions...
And I will make arguments, of course, as I consider the evidence...I am very keen on a Gordon Woods' approach of just outlining the arguments as a narrative, up front, and then making the case...I also appreciate Joe Nye's and Amartya Sen's and Stephen Jay Gould's approach of organizing arguments by relevance to support an overall case (and Gould's penchant for teaching about logic as he takes you through his case)...and I love Abraham Maslow's style in The Farther Reaches of Human Nature of just doing what I've tried to do with this blog which is just write as stream-of-consciousness as possible and to show his human side, as much as his thinking...but I'm not sure, yet, what the best way to write this will be...so I'm thinking about it openendedly...but this blogging experience has convinced me that perhaps a more organized means of presenting ideas would be more helpful for people in understanding them, better, than just this sometime stream-of-consciousness style on this blog...
The second part of the book will be a theoretical discussion of least possible necessary aggression as an alternative to our far too simplistic discussions about force and the use of power, thusfar...permutations...cases and examples...alternative scenarios...implications for all kinds of fields...
I have several books in me, really...I have at least one book on education and its role in cultural develoment, alone...I have a book on truth and reconciliation as a part and, at times, as a substitute for criminal procedure...the empirical record of its success and failings...and a discussion of how criminal, civil and other sanctions undermine more genuine healing for people involved...I have several books on international policy and understanding psychological variables that undergird attitudes in various international arenas which are the basis for international politics...
But the book on the limits to power and the reason why a more constructive and limited mindset about the use of power would accomplish many, many more of our international and domestic policy aims is the big one, right now...and the place where I want to spend my time, right now...
I need more people I can have these conversations with...we all do, is the truth...because many of the places where things are fucked up is where people don't have enough appreciation for the limits of capacity and how to generate important results rather than just demanding them or wishing for them without knowing what goes into creating them...
I have to say that no matter how much I'm doing in my career, though...as a teacher...as a writer...as a professor...as whatever...
I will always feel an emptiness as long as I don't have a family to share it with...
For some crazy reason, all of the insanity of this job makes me want to be a father all the more...finding the right woman to share that with is the trick, right now...someone who can challenge me, would be nice...and someone who cares about others comparable to me...I've not met that woman, I don't think...and certainly not a single one...
It's been a long time since I've had sex...and a lot longer since I've made love...
I watch lovemaking in movies, now, with the same longing as I used to watch porn with (OK...I guess they aren't really the same thing, actually...but you see where I'm going with this)...I miss sharing passion with someone...I miss loving someone that fully and longing for them that desperately...I've only really had it two times in my life...and even then, only really one time in my life where it was more like mature love...
And I have no plans on taking it for granted, this time, in the least...
I do need to find a woman who doesn't want to live her life scared...or with her life centered around money...I'm sure I'll plenty plenty of money in my lifetime...but I have no interest in having a relationship with someone who confuses this priority with the much more important priority of love totally for its own sake and totally independent of anything more base...
I want to make love with someone who I know loves me because...not because of money or prestige or anything else...just for love's sake...
I'm sure there's a woman out there like that, somewhere...
And the truth is that there is no book or research or class or any other work that ever could replace that in a person's life, sadly...if I outlive my spouse, that is a heartbreak I will have to live with until I meet someone new...if I meet someone new...maybe its not such a bad thing to belong to the gender that, on average, poops out, first...though I'd still rather live single than be dead alone...
I better get home before I fall asleep here in front of my computer...I was up late grading and buying fruit for my lesson on least common denominator, last night...
Have a great week, everyone...
Love,
Ben
