David Boies and Scooter Libby
Robert Novak is dead-on in his Washington Post article (which is rare for Robert, in my view, since he is, generally, such a mean-spirited, snarly son-of-a-bitch).
A Verdict on the Wilson Affair
If David Boies, the lawyer for Vice President Gore in Gore vs. Bush, is arguing that Libby shouldn't have been prosecuted because there was no underlying crime, for which I have seen zero evidence that there was and which the Judge specifically ruled inadmissable because, in all likelihood, there was no underlying crime - Valerie Plame was not likely covert, and certainly not within the 5 year timeline needed to make this the alleged crime - then liberals, Democrats, conservatives, and Republicans should be taking a second look at this case. Boises arguments are strong ones for an appeal in this case, and if they lose on appeal, President Bush should pardon Scooter Libby on the merits of the case, assuming that this is the case.
The truth is exactly what Robert Novak argues in this article. This was a political prosecution that was not sound on its own merits. If Valerie Plame was covert and Scooter Libby knew that fact and he and anyone or a conspiracy of folks in the Administration set out to expose her for political purposes, I have much less sympathy for Scooter Libby, even as I doubt this prosecution would do much good.
But the much more serious situation, here, is that it is very likely that David Boies is right. That there was no underlying crime here. And that liberals and the press have gotten wrapped up in their animus for the Administration and convicted a man for a crime for which there was no underlying crime. There is a very strong case to be made that this was a misunderstanding of an argument about the relationship between Joseph Wilson and his trip to Niger and the Administration and not an effort to out a covert CIA agent who, at this point, it does not appear was covert, and for which this case should likely be dismissed, unless evidence is produced to demonstrate otherwise. And even then, I, personally, would be open to a pardon, unless I hear a clear case for why his prosecution would do some actual good, for which I have not heard, for all of the cheerleading coverage I've heard on the conviction in this case.
The truth is that our bloodlust and eagerness to get tough and force our way through difficult issues has likely gotten the best of us in this situation. And a potentially and very likely innocent man's freedom may be hanging in the balance while we try to see past all of our animosities.
Lewis Libby still has my presumption of innocence in this case. Not because I don't think that he lied. I do think that he lied. I just think he lied about nothing out of his fear of being prosecuted, not necessarily because he had done anything illegal. The ever-feeding cycle of cynicism in this case and in Washington should not be a reason to put a man in jail. To the contrary, we should face up to the consequences of our zealous efforts to muscle our way through difficult issues if we ever want to get Washington on the better track.
Love,
Ben